Mansur gadzhiev fns. FSB beats out testimony by torture again !? Terrorism case adjourned

Today, October 30, a regular meeting was held on the case of young Dagestani workers Magomedkhabib Hajiyev and Nurlan Makhsudov, accused of preparing terrorist attacks in Moscow.

The process essentially began without any publicity. He received a resonance after the lawyer Timur Idalov, who himself entered the case, was unreasonably sentenced to 12 days of arrest for allegedly driving without a license, being detained right next to the court. There is no evidence that he was driving.

Human rights activists associate the fact of unlawful persecution of the lawyer with the fact that he took into account Hajiyev's statement about torture, namely, many hours of beating and the application of electric current to him. According to the testimony of Hajiyev, after the torture, he was taken to his work locker, where the components of explosives were “confiscated” from him under his cell, and a staged detention was carried out. An attempt to reject the beaten out testimony made in the IVS resulted in new torture. The same goes for Nurlan Makhsudov. Only in the pre-trial detention center the persons under investigation were able to refute the forced self-incrimination.

The photographs of Hajiyev in the case are striking - there are obvious traces of beatings on his face, which the court did not want to pay attention to earlier. The entry into the case of the lawyer Idalov and the OOD "For Human Rights" changed the situation. Lev Ponomarev, the head of the HRC, turned to the HRC Memorial for help, thanks to which another lawyer, Ivan Novikov, appeared in the case. The ZPC expert Petr Kuryanov, who at first performed the function of the press, entered the case as a public defender. Thus, the process became public knowledge.

Today the meeting was attended by the mother and grandmother of Gadzhiev, who came from Dagestan. While waiting in the corridor, they said that Mukhamedhabib had come to Moscow to earn money, to save money, he bought the simplest phones so that he could choose the most suitable one and sell his own. These telephones, according to the investigation, were supposed to serve for explosive devices (the defense side at the end of the meeting had the opportunity to get acquainted with them). The women said that the whole village was ready to vouch for Mukhamedhabib's innocence - 130 signatures were collected in support of him.

The defendants themselves were present at the meeting in glazed "glasses". The defense was represented by lawyers I. Novikov, V. Sidorov, and public defender P. Kuryanov. Judges - E. Borisov, O. Belousov, V. Madrin, prosecutor - E. Zotchik.

Throughout the session, the defense filed motions to obtain certain evidence. At the same time, Novikov's lawyer recalled Article 86 of the Criminal Procedure Code, according to which the court, on its own initiative, can also seek evidence in favor of the innocence of the accused. In particular, they talked about filming the detention of workers (according to Hajiyev's testimony, fictitious), where there are traces of torture.

Judge Borisov asked why the defense itself did not demand this evidence.

To this, the lawyer Novikov noted that the defense side repeatedly filed requests for familiarization with material evidence, which was refused. The circumstances of the arrest became known to the defense at the last stage of the process. In addition, a response to the lawyer's request can be received within a month, while the judge has the authority to demand a response to his request within the time period appointed by him.

Public defender Kuryanov indirectly reminded the court that his interests should include a fair trial. Supporting Novikov, he announced that he was asking the court for assistance in obtaining evidence that would affect the course of the entire case. He also stated that the court's refusal to provide such assistance entails a delay in the process.

Roughly the same story repeated itself with other motions, some of which were still granted. An application was also made for access to the list of materials submitted for verification to the UK.

In the course of finding out the details, the court wondered how the defense knew that the interrogation protocol, where the accused testified about torture, belonged to the documents transferred to the Investigative Committee, to which Pyotr Kuryanov replied that he had made these conclusions based on the presumption of the good faith of the court, which was simply obliged to do so. ...

In conclusion, the court granted the defense's petition to postpone the hearing for the defense to demand evidence, which takes time. This is an understandable decision, given that the investigation of the documents on torture by the UK should take at least a month. Thus, the continuation of the process has been postponed indefinitely. Participants will be notified separately about the next meeting.

Let us remind you that Magomedkhabib Hajiyev was born in 1995. and Nurlan Makhsudov 1994 were taken into custody on October 2, 2017 by the decision of the Meshchansky Court on suspicion of terrorist activity. They are charged under several articles at once, including participation in the activities of a terrorist organization (Article 205 of the Criminal Code) and illegal possession and acquisition of weapons (Article 222 of the Criminal Code). The defendants gave confessions, which they retracted, claiming that they were tortured. This statement is also supported by photographs from the case materials, where bruises and abrasions are visible on Gadzhiev's face.

At the end of October 2018, the court granted the prosecutor's request to read out the initial confessions of the defendants. However, the interrogation of Gadzhiev by the defense, in particular, by the public defender from the OOD "For Human Rights" Petr Kuryanov, in which the accused again spoke about torture, forced the court to send materials about the use of torture for verification in the UK.

The fight against corruption and tax evasion has long been a state fix idea. This is evidenced by the high-profile corruption cases that flare up all over Russia one after another. At the disposal of the editors were documents revealing a scheme of extortion at the very top of the capital's administration. Federal Tax Service... In the center of this corrupt web, woven of tax inspections, fines, lawyers and bribes, sat the head of the control department of the Federal Tax Service for Moscow, Mansur Salikhovich Gadzhiev.

In 2011, speaking to tax consultants, the head of the Federal Tax Service Mikhail Mishustin noticed that the Federal Tax Service is, first of all, a service company. “Our main task is to monitor compliance with the law. But this must be done as comfortably as possible for taxpayers, ”he stressed. And some of the employees of the Federal Tax Service in Moscow took this wish of the management too literally.

At the disposal of the editorial board were copies of statements sent to the General Prosecutor's Office, the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, the FSB and deputy Alexander Khinshtein. The authors of the letters - the victims of these additional services - describe in detail the scheme of extortion by an employee of the Moscow Federal Tax Service. In a story where a bribe presupposes development, and following the letter of the law means bankruptcy, Moscow businessmen chose corruption.

In the fall of 2014, a certain Mansur Gadzhiev became the head of the control department of the Federal Tax Service in Moscow, according to management, a young and thoughtful employee. He jumped to this position from the post of deputy head of the interdistrict inspection No. 49 in Moscow. When commenting on such a rapid service leap of their colleague, the tax officers used exclusively chess terms: from pawns to queens.

At his "royal post" the former middle peasant launched an unexpectedly violent activity. The management of the control department of the Moscow Federal Tax Service assumes supervision of all interdistrict inspections and control over the conduct of field tax audits. It is noteworthy that among the main activities of this department there is an item on "identifying forms, methods and" schemes "of tax evasion." Combining two leading messages: about a service company and identifying new tax evasion schemes, Hajiyev probably developed a simple but trouble-free service for the heads of Moscow firms: either pay taxes with the maximum possible fines, or pay me, and then at three times less. As the main assistant and intermediary in the transfer of money, Hajiyev attracted an acquaintance from the time of the "turbulent" youth of a lawyer.

The scheme turned out to be simple and convenient. As a result of any scheduled inspections of large enterprises, one can find tax inconsistencies, accounting errors, and even the use of "gray" schemes with one-day firms. It was the "landmark checks" that interested the corrupt official. Using information about violations identified by the subordinate inspectorates, he launched a mechanism for resolving problems with the help of a lawyer.

Some time after the audit, a lawyer appeared in the company, offering his services to reduce the amount of additional tax charges and fines. The documents and figures with which he operated, in addition to the company's management, could only be known to representatives of the tax service. For 10-30% of the amount, the lawyer guaranteed the cancellation or a significant reduction in the size of claims from the tax authorities without transferring the case to the pre-trial audit level. According to the lawyer, Mansur Hajiyev himself, the “gray cardinal of the tax service,” was involved in solving the problem, so there was no need to worry about a “happy outcome”. As an additional argument, he cited as an example the recent history of the audit by the 3rd tax inspectorate of the construction company MSM-1. The company refused to cooperate and decided to achieve a reduction in fines through the courts. As a result, the company incurred large legal costs, lost the trial, paid fines and today suspended its activities in Moscow. The company has suspended wages since November last year, according to posts on job feedback forums.

Recently, a similar situation has arisen in the well-known construction company "Krost", which is headed by former employees of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and FSB... The amount of tax claims was over 100 million rubles. In May 2015, a lawyer came up with a proposal to reduce the amount by three times, but the company's management found the claims unconvincing, and the lawyer's arguments were weak. With the help of old connections from previous work, the management of "Krost" fought off tax attacks, and "Mansurov's bribe" was never paid.

More than once, entrepreneurs tried to put pressure on the head of the control department, Mansur Hajiyev, using connections in federal circles. Such attempts were suppressed by a call from the curator of the Moscow Federal Tax Service from the APS (Apparatus of seconded employees) of the Federal Security Service Andrei Vladimirovich Kononenko. In one of the conversations, the "curator" flaunted the names of high officials of the FSB: Oleg "Fikus" Feoktistov and Ivan Ivanovich Tkachev. Resounding surnames made the position of Hajiyev and Kononenko practically untouchable. Andrei Kononenko has repeatedly stated that he "solves selfishness" to the acting "fighters" of the FSB through his person in the tax office, meaning Mansur Hajiyev.

Another interesting story happened with the owner of the Yashma Zoloto group of companies Igor Rakhimovich Mavlyanov. He had to pay compensation in the amount of more than a billion rubles. The mediator who took the money assured that Mansur Gadzhiev would transfer one third of the amount to Marina Viktorovna Tretyakova, the head of the Federal Tax Service of Russia in Moscow.

By the way, the owners of one of the construction companies, which fell victim to the new "service", tried to bargain with Gadzhiev, threatening to expose him in the face of Marina Tretyakova, head of the Federal Tax Service in Moscow. But, as it turned out, Tretyakova, who has been finalizing her last year to retire, has no influence on her subordinate, which Mansur Hajiyev himself admitted more than once in backstage conversations.

According to information from inspection No. 49, which checks the company ALLA LTD., (Buying and selling real estate) Mansur Salikhovich decides on the minimum charges, despite serious multimillion-dollar violations.

Currently, the "gray cardinal" is undergoing another operation, which was successful for him, but deplorable for the budget. The inspection of large enterprises in the sugar industry, carried out by Hajiyev's people, has once again, in our opinion, enriched the "thoughtful worker."

“Today, there is practically no doubt that if the story with the new corruption“ service ”does not get resonance, Mansur Gadzhiev will become the new head of the Moscow Federal Tax Service,” a source in the Russian Federal Tax Service claims. This likelihood is drawn to the attention of the Prosecutor General's Office and the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation and the author of the letter, a copy of which is at the disposal of the editorial board. In this case, there is no doubt that a new set of additional “services” for Moscow entrepreneurs may soon appear in the “price list” of the Moscow Federal Tax Service. Only these services are unlikely to be as comfortable for them as Mikhail Mishustin assured about it in his time.

Alexander Sedunov

As a high-ranking official of the Moscow Federal Tax Service, Hajiyev “forgot” about fines and charges for a “small share”

Alexander Sedunov

The fight against corruption and tax evasion has long been a state fix idea. This is evidenced by the high-profile corruption cases that flare up all over Russia one after another. At the disposal of the editorial board were documents revealing a scheme of extortion at the very top of the Moscow administration of the Federal Tax Service. In the center of this corrupt web, woven of tax inspections, fines, lawyers and bribes, sat the head of the control department of the Federal Tax Service for Moscow, Mansur Salikhovich Gadzhiev.

In 2011, speaking to tax consultants, the head of the Federal Tax Service noted that the Federal Tax Service is, first of all, a service company. “Our main task is to monitor compliance with the law. But this must be done as comfortably as possible for taxpayers, ”he stressed. And some of the employees of the Federal Tax Service in Moscow took this wish of the management too literally.

Recently, a similar situation has arisen in the well-known construction company Krost, which is headed by former employees of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the FSB. The amount of tax claims was over 100 million rubles. In May 2015, a lawyer came up with a proposal to reduce the amount by three times, but the company's management found the claims unconvincing, and the lawyer's arguments were weak. With the help of old connections from previous work, the management of "Krost" fought off tax attacks, and "Mansurov's bribe" was never paid.

More than once, entrepreneurs tried to put pressure on the head of the control department, Mansur Hajiyev, using connections in federal circles. Such attempts were suppressed by a call from the curator of the Moscow Federal Tax Service from the APS (Apparatus of seconded employees) of the Federal Security Service Andrei Vladimirovich Kononenko. In one of the conversations, the "curator" flaunted the names of high officials of the FSB: Oleg "Fikus" Feoktistov and Ivan Ivanovich Tkachev. Resounding surnames made the position of Hajiyev and Kononenko practically untouchable. Andrei Kononenko has repeatedly stated that he "solves selfishness" to the acting "fighters" of the FSB through his person in the tax office, meaning Mansur Hajiyev.

Find out what income your tax authorities received over the past year. UNP made a rating of the wealthiest heads of the tax service - 2017.

The FTS annually publishes information on employees' income on the website nalog.ru in the section "Anti-corruption"> "Information on income, expenses ...". The service also reflects data on the income of spouses and children of tax officials.

UNP has compiled a list of the richest and most humble leaders of the Federal Tax Service. Tax officials' revenues have been shrinking compared to last year. In 2016, the average income of a tax officer from the top 5 was about 15.7 million rubles, and in 2017 this figure dropped to 12.2 million rubles.

Mikhail Mishustin, the head of the department, remains in the top five. In second place in terms of income is the head of the Oryol department Sergei Markevich. It can be called “Breakthrough of the Year” because two years before that, he was ranked among the poorest tax authorities.

In the rating, we took into account only the leadership of the Federal Tax Service, but there were heads of inspections who receive more than the highest ranks of the tax service. Svetoslav Dolzhikov, the head of the Federal Tax Service Inspectorate No. 15 for Moscow, became the wealthiest in 2017. He declared 70.6 million rubles. In 2016, the tax officer reflected only 6.8 million rubles. Then he headed MIFNS No. 45 in Moscow.

Arthur Ayubov became the second among the richest tax officers of the last year. He, even being not the head, but only the deputy head of the Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service for the Sovetsky District of Makhachkala, reflected an income of 30.8 million rubles. In the previous year, the income was 20 times less - 1.5 million rubles. In addition to the main income, Artur Ayubov received a car as a gift in 2017.

The top three richest are closed by another deputy chief Ruslan Mirzemagamedov. His place of work is the Federal Tax Service Administration for the Republic of Dagestan. In 2017, the official earned RUB 21.2 million. This is a multiple leap in income compared to last year, when the tax officer reflected 1.1 million rubles.

The highest income in the declaration of all those involved in the FTS was shown not by the tax authorities themselves, but by their husbands and wives. The absolute leader was the spouse of the head of the Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service for the Leninsky District of Saratov. He declared an income of 1.2 billion rubles. for 2017.

The wife of Mikhail Mishustin this year took the last place in the top 5 richest spouses of tax authorities. It reflected 68.5 million in revenue. At the same time, the remaining places were taken by the wives of the deputy heads of the Federal Tax Service Inspectorate No. 45 and No. 30 in Moscow and the husband of the deputy head of the Federal Tax Service Inspectorate No. 3 in the Republic of Bashkortostan. They reflected 115, 85 and 76 million rubles. income.

The wealthiest tax executives in Russia

Mikhail Mishustin
Head of the Federal Tax Service, born in 1966

Income 19.3 million rubles.

Compared to previous periods, incomes have stabilized. Previously, the amount in the declarations decreased, but in 2017 the chief tax officer showed an increase of 0.4 million rubles. Housing and land are not owned.

Sergey Markevich
Head of the Federal Tax Service for the Oryol Region, born in 1969

Income RUB 13.9 million

Natalia Voronova
Head of the Tax Authorities Control Department of the Federal Tax Service, b. unknown

Income 11.9 million rubles

In 2016, she received half as much - 5.3 million rubles. income. Until last year, she owned a modest plot of 10 acres. If an extra zero did not crept into the report, then in 2017 the land plot grew to 1 hectare.

Tatiana Vorobyova
Advisor to the head of the Federal Tax Service, b. 1952

Income 8 million rubles

In 2017, she became an advisor to the chief tax officer and immediately got into the ranking of the richest employees of the service. At the same time, the composition of the property has not changed - two apartments, a plot of 10 acres and a small building of 90 sq. m.

Tatiana Matveeva
Head of the Information Technology Department of the Federal Tax Service, born in 1976

Income 7.8 million rubles

An apartment of 79.8 square meters has disappeared from the property. m, but received housing for use of 133.7 sq. m. The husband also doubled his income. In 2016, it reflected 6.2 million rubles, and in 2017, already 13.2 million rubles. income.

Tax executives who get the least

Mansur Hajiyev
Head of the Federal Tax Service for the Astrakhan Region, born in 1977

Income 1.3 million rubles

He has only been working as a chief for two years. Prior to that, he was the head of the control department at the Federal Tax Service in Moscow. Last year was a bad harvest for the official, in 2016 his income was 3.6 million rubles.

Sergey Voronin
Head of the Federal Tax Service for the Belgorod Region, born in 1979

Income 1.3 million rubles

He headed the department towards the end of 2017. Prior to that, he worked as a chief at the Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service for the city of Belgorod. The new position increased the tax collector's income from 961 thousand rubles. in 2016 to the current figure.

Victor Bolshakov
Head of the Federal Tax Service for the Nizhny Novgorod Region, born in 1973

Income 1.4 million rubles

He came to the position of the head in March 2018. Before that, he was one of the deputies. The family owns two apartments, a plot of 20 acres and a house of 172 sq. m. In addition, it has two cars and three parking spaces.

Denis Smekhov
Head of the Federal Tax Service for the Kirov region, born in 1979

Income RUB 1.5 million

He became the head only in March 2018. Income compared to last year increased by only 330 thousand rubles. Together with his wife, he owns an apartment, two more apartments and a plot of land are in use.

Khazret Nirov
Head of the Federal Tax Service for the Karachay-Cherkess Republic, b. 1977

Income RUB 1.5 million

Returned to the list of the most modest tax authorities after last year's break. For the second year in a row, the spouse of a tax inspector earns less than 200 thousand rubles. The manager has 6 acres of property and a house of 137 sq. m.

Mansur Gadzhiev has become the new head of the department of the Federal Tax Service for the Astrakhan Region.

Mansur Gadzhiev, Advisor to the State Civil Service of the Russian Federation, 2nd class, is 39 years old, he was born in the village of Nikolaevka, Narimanov District, Astrakhan Region. In 1999 he graduated with honors from the Astrakhan State Technical University, in 2001 - from the Higher School of Economics. Since 2000, he worked in the civil service in the tax authorities of Moscow. By order of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation of 05/17/2016, he was appointed head of the Department of the Federal Tax Service for the Astrakhan Region.

In 2008, he was awarded the badge of distinction "Excellent Worker of the Federal Tax Service of Russia", in 2015 - the jubilee medal of the Federal Tax Service "25 Years of the Tax Authorities of Russia". He is married and has two children.

Information agency "Mosmonitor", "Kompromat.ru":

Mansour - "33 percent"

As a high-ranking official of the Moscow Federal Tax Service, Hajiyev "forgot" about fines and charges for a "small share"

The fight against corruption and tax evasion has long been a state fix idea. This is evidenced by the high-profile corruption cases that flare up all over Russia one after another. At the disposal of the editorial board were documents revealing a scheme of extortion at the very top of the Moscow administration of the Federal Tax Service. In the center of this corrupt web, woven of tax inspections, fines, lawyers and bribes, sat the head of the control department of the Federal Tax Service for Moscow, Mansur Salikhovich Gadzhiev.

In 2011, speaking to tax consultants, the head of the Federal Tax Service Mikhail Mishustin noted that the Federal Tax Service is, first of all, a service company. “Our main task is to monitor compliance with the law. But this must be done as comfortably as possible for taxpayers, ”he stressed. And some of the employees of the Federal Tax Service in Moscow took this wish of the management too literally.

More than once, entrepreneurs tried to put pressure on the head of the control department, Mansur Hajiyev, using connections in federal circles. Such attempts were suppressed by a call from the curator of the Moscow Federal Tax Service from the APS (Apparatus of seconded employees) of the Federal Security Service Andrei Vladimirovich Kononenko. In one of the conversations, the "curator" flaunted the names of high officials of the FSB: Oleg "Fikus" Feoktistov and Ivan Ivanovich Tkachev. Resounding surnames made the position of Hajiyev and Kononenko practically untouchable. Andrei Kononenko has repeatedly stated that he "solves selfishness" to the acting "fighters" of the FSB through his person in the tax office, meaning Mansur Hajiyev.