Appeals from citizens regarding GIS GMP. What is GIS GMP? State information system on state and municipal payments

State Information system on state and municipal payments (GIS GMP) - a source of information for individuals and legal entities Issues of providing state and municipal services to the population using the latest information technologies- one of the most discussed topics in our society. Today, online government services are becoming a reality. The most important step in this direction has been taken - a single source of information is being created about the facts of payment by applicants when receiving state and municipal services. This is the State Information System on State and Municipal Payments (GIS GMP). We are talking with the Deputy Head of the Federal Treasury Department for the Vladimir Region, Svetlana Vladimirovna Zhidomorova, about how it will work.

Svetlana Vladimirovna, the abbreviation GIS GMP is well known. Tell us more about this information system.
- GIS GMP is a centralized system that provides reception, recording and transmission of information between its participants. The system accumulates a huge amount of information and provides citizens with real-time service when receiving public services and allows you to quickly convey to the consumer information about his obligations to the state according to the “one window” principle. This ensures the realization of the rights of our citizens to receive state and municipal services without providing documents confirming the fact of payment. GIS GMP will provide information about payment in in electronic format to each department upon their request.
GIS GMP is designed for a wide range of consumers, both individuals and legal entities, and allows them to obtain up-to-date information about charges made to them and payments made by them.
In accordance with the Budget Code (Article 166.1), the Federal Treasury is vested with budgetary powers to create, maintain, develop and maintain the GIS GMP. It also, in agreement with the Central Bank of the Russian Federation in accordance with Federal law dated July 27, 2010 No. 210-FZ “On the organization of the provision of state and municipal services,” establishes the procedure for maintaining GIS GMP.
Order of the Federal Treasury dated November 30, 2012 No. 19n “On approval of the procedure for maintaining GIS GMP” (registered with the Ministry of Justice on December 25, 2012 No. 26329) determined the list of participants in the system, the list of information required for payment, including the amount payable, the procedure for receiving it and provision, procedure for access to the information system.
- Who are the participants of the GIS GMP?
- Administrators of budget revenues, organizations for accepting payments (credit organizations, postal organizations, etc.), portals, multifunctional centers (MFC).
By connecting to the system of interdepartmental electronic interaction (ISIE), these bodies gain access to the GIS GMP in order to place the necessary data or obtain the necessary information. This information, through the GIS GMP, enters the Unified Portal of state and municipal services (functions) and is available to information consumers - both legal and individuals. If it is impossible to access the portal, information can be obtained through the MFC and credit organizations.
I would especially like to emphasize the need to connect credit institutions that accept payments to the budget and off-budget funds(and this is the vast majority of banks). This will allow banks to promptly send information about the client making a payment.
There will no longer be a need to conclude dozens of agreements between revenue administrators and credit institutions on the transfer of information about payments - all information will be contained in the GIS GMP.
In the future, by contacting any bank, the client will be able to immediately receive information about all charges and debts to the budget.
How the GIS GMP works can be seen in the diagram published below.
All types of messages, their composition and requirements for the transfer of information are contained in the GIS GMP interaction formats, which were developed by the Federal Treasury and published in the public domain on the website www.roskazna.ru in the section State Information System on State and Municipal Payments/GIS GMP.
There are three types of data in the system: accrual (preliminary and advance), payment and receipt.
Preliminary charges are generated without the payer's request, and payment, as a rule, is made after the charge is generated (for example, a traffic police fine). An advance accrual is formed after the payer applies; the payment, as a rule, is made before the accrual is generated (for example, state duty). When the administrator places information about charges in the system, payment details become available both for payers and for organizations for receiving and transferring payments, portals, and multifunctional centers.
If we talk about payments, then information about the order of an individual or legal entity accepted for execution by the operator for accepting or transferring payments is generated by a bank, other credit institution, federal postal service organization, or payment agent. This information is available to administrators, portals and MFCs.
A receipt is a document that is the result of acknowledgment (comparing information about accrued and paid payments), generated and signed by GIS GMP in automatic mode and is available for administrators, portals, and MFCs.
- It turns out that electronic interaction is beneficial and convenient for everyone?
- Certainly. For payers, this is prompt information about accrued and paid payments, the presence of debt, simplification of the payment procedure, including in real time. There is no need to submit receipts or payment orders to government agencies confirming the facts of payment for the provision of public services.
For revenue administrators - receiving information about completed payments online, reducing the costs of administering payments, increasing awareness of the status of debt for each payer, reducing the volume of unidentified receipts.
GIS GMP will allow you to receive state and municipal services immediately after they are paid for, and not after enrollment and transfer of information to the revenue administrator.
In 2012, an information system for recording accruals and payment facts (UNIFO) functioned, which was the prototype of the GIS GMP. The Federal Treasury Department for the Vladimir Region has connected 404 participants to the UNIFO system. Among them are the operator of a regional portal, a multifunctional center (Vladimir), administrators of regional and local budgets, and regional credit organizations. In addition, the Interregional operational management Federal Treasury 48 administrators are registered in the system federal budget, Federal Treasury - more than 40 credit organizations.
Currently, in connection with the entry into force of the Order of the Federal Treasury of November 30, 2012 No. 19n “On approval of the procedure for maintaining the GIS GMP,” all participants in the UNIFO system are re-registered in the GIS GMP, and new participants are registered. To do this, it is necessary to submit an application for registration to the Office of the Federal Treasury for the Vladimir Region - institutions whose accounts are opened in the Office, and to the remaining participants - in addition to the application, also a package of documents approved by the specified order.

Since 2013, the State Information System on State and Municipal Payments (GIS GMP) has been implemented. Now Russian citizens do not need to attach receipts for payment to the state treasury. On the Internet resource of the information center, the Treasury publishes data on accrued/paid obligations in favor of the state.

The system is developed by experience foreign countries. The main goal is a tool for obtaining data to provide high-quality, fast, convenient service to the population or businesses.

How does the center function in theory?

GIS GMP is centralized system, which ensures the reception, recording and transmission of information on payment for state and municipal services, as well as on the accrual of obligations online. Its participants are:

• The Treasury of Russia is a database moderator.
• Budget managers of all levels issue accrued amounts for payment;
• Organizations accepting payments - banks, credit unions, payment organizations;
• Treasuries and local financial institutions
• Portals, multifunctional centers, Russian Post;

For the convenience of citizens, a government portal has been created, on which a list of services provided by all departments has been created. Through it you can find out the parameters of your personal account in Pension Fund, about traffic police fines, about court proceedings, tax debts. Regardless of your location, you can obtain a passport, submit tax return, register vehicles, receive extracts, registration certificates.

To use this service, you must register Personal Area. Personal data is entered into a special form: first name, last name, TIN, card number social insurance. For non-residents - migration card number. After receiving the confirmation code, your personal account is activated.

Only available to unregistered users general information about the resource and services on it.

With the help of such a tool, citizens have the opportunity to receive data on accrued debts to the government apparatus, as well as on paid services, in one place. Government agencies do not have the right to demand papers confirming payments. Checks and statements are submitted only at your own request.

The information center receives data on debt amounts from government departments, and data on payments from institutions that accept payments. It maintains control over accrued and paid obligations for: fines, duties, penalties, taxes, and fees.

How does the resource actually work?

The law on the State Information System of the State Medical Service was adopted back in 2013, and its implementation began three years ago, but the resource does not work as expected.

Lack of acts regulating the work of the Information Center

To date, specific regulations, defining a list of mandatory information that government agencies must send to the GIS. Each participant perceives the principles of interaction in his own way. The result is confusion and a flood of unnecessary data.

When users talk about the uselessness of the information they receive, GIS participants refer to legislation. Moreover, they interpret the articles of the law literally. Additional regulations and the various explanations make it even more confusing.

There is also no current list of services that GIS uses.

The responsibility of financial institutions for submitting data on payments to the state is not fixed. Therefore, in the regions, a significant number of banks do not cooperate with GIS GMP. They simply did not carry out the connection procedure. Government agency transmits accrual data, but financial institutions that accepted the payment do not transmit payment data.

The roles of GIS members are not assigned. Information about payment can be transmitted by both financial institutions and the body that received the payment. As a result, the data is duplicated.

A significant part of budget revenues is state duty. But today, there are no clear tools for its use in the information environment.

Inadequate coordination framework

There are regions where one government agency coordinates, gradually establishing communication in the GIS GMP of government/municipal apparatuses. In the same time, financial institutions I work separately from each other. There is no special liability for failure to submit payment data to the center, so many of them do not have a connection to the center at all. Or, they convey useless information. Payments are not tied to the service or payer.

Shortcomings in technical equipment

Developers of software resources for the center are not faced with requirements to control the supply of data. This leads to confusion within the resource. For example, one of the government departments submits information about the payment of an obligation, but does not request information about its accrual. As a result, institutions do not see the full picture of mutual settlements. “Garbage” accumulates in the database, and the information obtained is not applied.

The situation leads to the fact that users cannot fully use the information stored in a single database.

How to improve the functionality of the GMP information center?

The first step towards optimizing the work of the State Information System is the formation of a clear, simple, accessible register of services of state/city departments, which will be used in information base. At the initial stage, in online versions The list does not necessarily indicate the entire range of services. They can be added in stages.

The created list must be posted on the state portal, where everyone involved in the information environment can gain access. A convenient search for services should be introduced on the resource and a list of popular services should be highlighted. You can use the service only if it is on the list. Updates to the website should be controlled by a government agency.

For the convenience of obtaining data and supervision, all services should be divided into two groups:

• Accrued;
• Prepaid.

Requests for information on accrued debts are submitted by government/city departments. Requests for information on prepaid contributions - financial institutions. All information about accrued and paid services must be interconnected: the name and the specific person who received/paid for it.

Formation of nomenclature and coordination of relationships between members of the GIS GMP in the districts. The main participants are the government agencies that provide the services and the financial institutions that receive the payments. The Federal Treasury and the Central Bank can act as coordinators on both sides. state level, and their divisions - at the regional level. These bodies will be able to coordinate and control the communication process between participants in the information system.

How should the service work?

Work united information Center maybe in two scenarios.

Scenario one: sales of accrued services

The agency providing the service advances the amount to be paid. On the website in the government register, he creates accruals for a specific person and submits this data to the GIS State Historical Museum. This person applies to a financial institution to pay the outstanding obligations. In its turn, financial institution identifies the payer, finds information about charges in the database, accepts payment, sends a payment notification to the GIS GMP.

Scenario two: prepaid service.

An individual or enterprise turns to a financial institution to pay its obligations. The financial organization finds this service in the general register, forms the receipt of payment from a specific person, and notifies the GIS GMP.

The agency providing this service finds the payment notification in the system, identifies the payer, calculates the amount of debt, and sends the information to the GIS GMP.

Thanks to such a mechanism, the information center has all the materials for connecting and accounting for accruals and payments received. And citizens will be able to receive information about services through GIS.

In order for the data in the center to be useful and not create chaos, it is necessary to ensure control over its supply. Movements of funds should be recorded only for those transactions that are listed on the government resource. Services outside the list should be provided/paid for without submitting information to the State Information System.

So, today the state information system does not live up to the hopes placed on it. This is due to:

• lack of a normative and methodological framework regulating the relationships of all its participants;
• lack of coherence in the work of institutions carrying out procedures and organizations accepting payment;
• defects in the software;
• in some places, lack of proper supervision over the implementation of functionality.

A properly established process of exchanging and storing information will allow interaction between departments and organizations, facilitate the identification of accrued/paid debts, and help maintain correct records of budget revenues.

For the population and legal entities, the GIS GMP can become a truly useful and effective service tool for state/city departments.

The creation of such a system as the GIS GMP (state information system on state and municipal payments) is to be welcomed. And the main thing here is not that government agencies do not have the right to demand from the applicant a receipt for payment for services, but the main thing, in my opinion, is to increase the transparency of revenues to budgets of all levels for all participants budget process. Before the introduction of the GIS GMP, the Federal Treasury had information only about the receipt of payments to budgets of all levels in accordance with budget classification, but never had any information about what was actually supposed to arrive. Now, with the introduction of the GIS GMP (if, of course, it works at full capacity), it will be possible to compare what should go to the budget (accrued) and what actually came (paid/credited). This provides completely new opportunities for administering budget revenues at all levels and obtaining a completely new level of analytical information for decision-making in the field of interbudgetary relations.

It is very correct that not only budget revenue administrators, but also budgetary, autonomous and government institutions that provide services should post information about payments in the GIS GMP. Because either way they are the recipients budget funds and when planning a budget, it is necessary to have reliable information about their own income.

I will very briefly describe how the GIS GMP is conceived. Each administrator of budget revenues at all levels, as well as budgetary, autonomous and government institutions must post information about accruals. Each accrual is identified by the so-called UIN - a unique accrual identifier. Credit organizations (the “fathers and progenitors” of GIS GMP mean banks) turn to GIS GMP, find the required accrual and place payment information in GIS GMP. The Federal Treasury “acknowledges” paid accruals, i.e. puts a mark on inclusion in the budget. Revenue administrators for UIN receive “feedback” about payment, enrollment and process it accordingly in their information systems - take into account overpayments, underpayments, charge penalties, fines, transfer information on defaulters to bailiffs, etc. Interaction with the GIS GMP is carried out through SMEV using a web service specially developed for these purposes. Accordingly, to work, you need to perform a number of procedures for connecting both to the GIS GMP itself and to the SMEV.

In our municipality, we tested working with GIS GMP at one institution. Everything is functional, but it is not yet possible to use it in full mode for a number of reasons, the main one of which is the lack of a “stable feedback from credit institutions." In our case, in particular, these are Sberbank of the Russian Federation and Russian Post, through which more than 90% of payments pass.

In my subjective opinion, when creating the GIS GMP, a number of methodological mistakes were made that need to be corrected for its full functioning.

Several miscalculations are associated with credit institutions. At the municipal level, there are about 150-170 types (types) of charges that must be placed in the GIS GMP. There are exotic ones that can theoretically appear once every five years, or even less often, and there are those that periodically appear once a quarter. The most critical for the municipality are monthly payments, such as fees for childcare preschool institution, rent for the rental of municipal property, primarily municipal premises, both residential under social tenancy agreements and non-residential, rented mainly by entrepreneurs. These payments are subject to penalties and fines, and therefore payment information should be received promptly, ideally immediately upon payment.

As I mentioned above, the main credit organizations that accept payments in the municipality are Sberbank of the Russian Federation and the Russian Post. Both “offices” are “semi-state”, but neither one nor the other currently works fully with the GIS GMP. Regarding the Russian Post, I do not have information about the state of affairs. According to Sberbank of the Russian Federation, the situation is as follows. Sberbank of the Russian Federation, with its huge and large-scale infrastructure, where several hundred or even thousands of payments per second are processed, cannot organize interaction in the GIS GMP online. The point here is most likely due to the unsatisfactory throughput of SMEV and GIS GMP for these purposes. One should not discount the fact that this is a “semi-sovereign office” and has a certain amount of inertia and snobbery, which let it down in this case. In any case, today they are trying to do something. To turn the situation around, in particular, they are working to introduce offline interaction, mainly regarding taxes and traffic police fines, which does not make it any easier for us at the municipal level in solving our problems. They work “crookedly” - today they place the previously mentioned UIN in the purpose of payment field, i.e. in the comments to the payment. Which, in principle, destroys the entire harmonious structure of the GIS GMP and creates additional difficulties for everyone except Sberbank. But apparently there will be progress in this direction, because... the federal treasury even developed a special one for them. format in the GIS GMP, which appeared in June.

The second problem is with credit institutions. There are many more of them than the federal treasury assumes. For example, at the municipal level we have cash settlement center(RCC) Housing and communal services. Which also carries out payments for social rent. It is clear that he is obliged to place them in the GIS GMP. But the same RCC also collects funds, both through its cash desks and terminals, and under agreements with enterprises and organizations when rent is deducted from salaries. Those. in fact, the RCC Housing and Communal Services is both an “administrator” of income and a credit institution. As in other matters, every institution that transfers rent for an employee is also a credit institution. Those. The range of credit institutions is much wider.

In fact, we have - the GIS GMP is much larger than even the same SBOL (Sberbank-on-line) and is payment system nationwide. Accordingly, such a system must be subject to corresponding requirements for communication channels, the power of computing resources and the software used.

In addition, the GIS GMP is a real-time system. One of the problems that arose in full height, interaction with GIS GMP when paying state fees at registry offices. If previously the applicant came with a receipt for payment of the state fee and wrote an application, now everything should look something like this - he submitted the application, the civil registry office employee entered the information into the GIS GMP, went out to the lobby (to the nearest ATM) and paid. I returned, and the registry office employee already had the information. In my opinion, it is absolutely unrealistic. An alternative is to issue documents from the civil registry office without receiving information about payment of the state fee. Which is fraught with non-payments and extra burden on the bailiff service.

From all that has been said above, I believe that the use of SMEV as a transport when interacting with the GIS GMP is not justified due to the huge volumes of information that do not correspond to the purposes for which SMEV was created. But not to use the communication channels used by SMEV would be criminal, because the alternative is to create the same parallel secure network with the costs of its creation and maintenance.

Another “methodological” miscalculation. It is clear that the “progenitors” of the GIS GMP wanted to avoid problems with personal data as much as possible, and in the accrual they by default identify a person by SNILS plus another 12-15 alternative documents. Well, how can the same credit institution work when I come and say I’m Ivanov, well, look what I owe to the state/municipality there? And in response to me - would you be so kind as to tell me your SNILS? I don’t have to remember it and carry it with me. Well, not a problem, with the right approach you can request it through SMEV, although it is also difficult - there are many namesakes. And if in one place they charged me according to SNILS, the traffic police issued a fine on my driver’s license, or something else on 12-15 documents? No way in life credit organisation will not collect all my accruals hanging out in the GIS GMP, issued on different documents. And I simply may not know on what document the “owe” was assigned to me in the GIS GMP. As a result, I will turn out to be a malicious defaulter and people will be puzzled by me bailiffs, who already have a lot of work to do, and they won’t even let me go abroad. So this is also not good. What if I want to pay for my mother (grandmother) who is in the hospital? But here we return again to the problem of identification. In my opinion, SNILS, chosen at PSU as an identifier, is not entirely the right decision, but this is purely my opinion. But one day, an incorrectly chosen decision will always remain a “bone in the throat.”

A few more words about connecting administrators at the municipal level to the GIS GMP. There are several options for connecting accrual administrators to the GIS GMP, incl. and through so-called aggregators. But only a local government body can be an aggregator, when in fact financial authorities are involved in organizing the budget process locally - financial departments, financial departments, etc., and they are in accordance with budget code cannot be a local government body. As a result, local financiers will have less information about the actual state of affairs in the field of revenues than the federal treasury has, especially in cases where “everyone is for himself,” that is, each institution and revenue administrator independently interacts with the GIS GMP. In my opinion, there are two ways to fix this - force everyone (at the municipal level) to interact with the GIS GMP only through the financial authority. And the second, less preferable (due to the increase in traffic) is to enable financial authorities to receive from the GIS GMP all information about accruals and receipts from all institutions and administrators local budget located on their territory. There is another solution to the problem: make an intermediate link when interacting with the GIS GMP - one per municipality, regardless of the chosen connection scheme to the GIS GMP. And all interaction is carried out only through him. There is a complete understanding of how this can and should be done.

In my subjective opinion, these are the main problems, without solving which, although “beautifully conceived, the GIS GMP will not fly.” And so the system is quite functional - we touched it, we know. But we won’t use it, we’ll work “the old fashioned way.” Old, time-tested accounting systems are better than new ones, rebuilt according to understandable logic, but for a number of reasons absolutely beyond our control and listed above, are not functional.

There are also various little things, such as the formation of a penal system for budgetary, autonomous/state-owned institutions, but this can all be corrected “as the play progresses,” of course, if you look a little closer and be puzzled by the possibility of obtaining all sorts of different analytics at further stages.

1. The state information system on state and municipal payments is an information system designed to post and receive information on the payment by individuals and legal entities of payments for the provision of state and municipal services, services specified in Part 3 of Article 1 and Part 1 of Article 9 of this Federal Law , other payments that are sources of budget revenues budget system Russian Federation(with the exception of payments that are sources of revenue generation for the budgets of the budget system of the Russian Federation, the list of which is established in accordance with budget legislation Russian Federation), as well as other payments, in cases provided for by federal laws.

2. The creation, maintenance, development and maintenance of the State Information System on state and municipal payments is carried out by the Federal Treasury.

3. The procedure for maintaining the State information system on state and municipal payments is established by the Federal Treasury in agreement with Central Bank Russian Federation. The following order is determined:

1) a list of information required for payment, including the amount payable, for state and municipal services, services specified in Part 3 of Article 1 and Part 1 of Article 9

(see text in the previous edition)

2) a list of information on payment of state and municipal services, services specified in Part 3 of Article 1 and Part 1 of Article 9 of this Federal Law, other payments that are sources of revenue generation for the budgets of the budget system of the Russian Federation, as well as other payments, in cases provided for federal laws, the procedure for its receipt and provision;

(see text in the previous edition)

3) the procedure for accessing the State Information System on state and municipal payments;

4) the procedure for recording the time of availability of the State Information System on state and municipal payments, as well as the time of receipt of the information specified in paragraphs 1 and this part into the State Information System on state and municipal payments.

4. A bank, other credit organization, federal postal service organization, bodies that open and maintain personal accounts in accordance with the budgetary legislation of the Russian Federation, including those making payments in electronic form, as well as other bodies or organizations through which payments are made Money the applicant for state and municipal services, services specified in Part 3 of Article 1 and Part 1 of Article 9 of this Federal Law, other payments that are sources of revenue generation for the budgets of the budget system of the Russian Federation, as well as other payments, in cases provided for by federal laws, are obliged immediately, if there are sufficient funds to execute the order to transfer funds, no later than the day the corresponding order is accepted for execution, and if an order to transfer funds is accepted for execution after 21:00 local time - no later than the day following the day the corresponding order is accepted for execution , send information about their payment to the State Information System on state and municipal payments.

(see text in the previous edition)

4.1. Refunds to individuals and legal entities in cases where they make payments provided for in Part 1 of this article, with the exception of payments, the procedure for return of which is established by federal laws, is made by the recipient of funds in accordance with general requirements, installed federal body executive power, carrying out the functions of developing public policy and legal regulation in the field of budgetary, tax, insurance, currency, and banking activities.

5. State and municipal institutions immediately no later than the day of accrual of the amount payable by the applicant for the services provided specified in Part 3 of Article 1 and Part 1 of Article 9 of this Federal Law, other payments that are sources of revenue generation for the budgets of the budget system of the Russian Federation, as well as other payments, in cases , provided for by federal laws, and if it is accrued after 21:00 local time - no later than the day following the day of accrual, they are required to send the information necessary for its payment to the State Information System on State and Municipal Payments.

(see text in the previous edition)

In order to optimize interaction government agencies, citizens and organizations regarding the transfer of various payments to the budget, the Russian legislator established special system- GIS GMP.

The State Information System on State and Municipal Payments (GIS GMP) is a centralized system that ensures the reception, recording and transmission of information between its participants, which are budget revenue administrators, organizations for accepting payments, portals, multifunctional centers, the interaction of which with the GIS GMP is carried out through the system of interdepartmental electronic interaction. GIS GMP allows individuals and legal entities to obtain information about their obligations to the budgets of the budget system of the Russian Federation according to the “single window” principle.

The main goal of the system is to combine in one place information about all payments of citizens that are accepted by government agencies and municipal organizations. The system contains information about the following payments:

• For municipal and government services.
• For services provided by government agencies and municipal organizations where state or municipal orders or assignments were placed.
• For state and municipal services that are mandatory for provision.
• For sources of budget income generation.

There are other services, payment for which can be tracked in the GIS GMP. Traffic police fines, Rosreestr services, duties and fines of the Main Directorate for Migration Affairs of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and others provided for by the legislation of the Russian Federation. Additionally, the state information system on state and municipal payments provides for the collection of information on the payment of debts in enforcement proceedings.

What is GIS GMP for a citizen? First of all, it is a tool for obtaining information about debts to the budget. To do this, you need to contact any bank or download an application connected to the GIS GMP. Fines, debts for taxes and other payments accrued in accordance with the law are recorded in databases corresponding system. Upon request, they are transmitted by the competent authorities to interested parties.

The GIS GMP information system also allows not only citizens, but also organizations to receive information about what obligations they have to budgets at various levels.

Work in the system is carried out using formats established by the Federal Treasury. There are quite a few of them, but let’s look at the main and most popular ones in practice:

• Messages involved by the service.
• Import, export, refinement or cancellation of system entities.
• Request in GIS GMP, or general format.

Naturally, they are systematically adjusted and modernized by treasury developers.

Main feature The operation of the system is the use of various identifiers. Let's consider their features. Any notice sent to the GIS GMP operator must contain information about who is paying and payment details. Payers can be both ordinary citizens and legal entities.

Individual identifiers include:

• Insurance number pension certificate.
• TIN number.
• Details of the passport of a citizen of the Russian Federation.
• Number driver's license or car registration certificate.
• FMS registration code and other details permitted by Russian legislation.

The legal entity identifier can be:

• TIN number.
• UIN (optional condition required for certain subjects).

To make a payment to the budget, you need to contact, for example, a bank and provide the listed identifiers. Below you can check your car or driver for fines.

Check fines for a car or driver

In order to make a payment in the system, you must adhere to the following algorithm:

• For the FSSP: date of resolution, category and number enforcement proceedings, amount to be paid.
• For the traffic police: the number and date of the fine, the amount to be paid..
• To pay taxes and tax debts: enter either the TIN number or the tax document.
• For Rosreestr: indicate the payment code consisting of 20 digits.

Specify the purpose of payment:

• For the FSSP: you need to select the bailiff department and region, OKTMO is entered automatically by the system.
• For the traffic police: the type of violation, region and division are indicated, the KBK is set automatically by the system; To pay the duty, a region and a division are selected, OKTMO is entered automatically by the system.

Provide information about the payer:

• For an individual: full last name, first name, patronymic, region and registration address.
• Confirm payment details. In GIS GMP, payment verification is a mandatory step in processing a transfer. After all, if the details are incorrectly specified, the payment may not go through or go inappropriately, which will aggravate the situation. The system provides a sample receipt where a citizen can verify all data.

Select payment method:

• Bank card.
• Mobile phone account.

Next comes the completion of the payment process. A window will appear in front of the payer notifying him of the transaction using the system. He can save or print this notice, and track information about payments and, in particular, the status in the GIS GMP, in his personal account.

So, having studied the system, it becomes clear that it is designed to increase efficiency and reduce labor costs of employees of the relevant services when considering issues related to monetary transfers from citizens or organizations in favor of the state.

Also, the main database is available to persons who contact financial organizations to inform about debts, etc.

The main department responsible for the operation, updating and modernization of the GIS GMP is the Federal Treasury. Besides the last one active participants systems include financial organizations, multifunctional centers, government services portal, payment systems, revenue administrators, ordinary citizens and legal entities.